On Feb 16, 7:58 pm, "Ball of Fluff" wrote:
> On Feb 16, 3:25 am, "Kevin Brady" wrote:
>
>
>
> > "Zinj" wrote in message
>
> >news:MPG.203ea7c99270f561989869@news2.lightlink.com...
>
> > > In article <45d4d...@news2.lightlink.com>, gomorr...@hotmail.com
> > > says...
>
> > >
>
> > >> People can argue
> > >> endlessly over the definition of what a scientologist is, but to me, it's
> > >> a
> > >> person who practices scientology to the extent they have been trained in
> > >> it,
> > >> and I find people who haven't been trained (or trained themselves, using
> > >> internet resources) to at least Class V, and preferably Class VI to be
> > >> essentially blow-hards who don't understand the subject.
>
> > > Strange. By your definition, since I've never been 'trained' in
> > > Scientology, and I practice it to the level of my 'training'
> > > (not at all), I'm a Scientologist :)
>
> > If that's what you took from it, good! Adroit sidestepping of the point, as
> > usual.
>
> > > Sounds like the Fluffy definition, where anyone who 'uses
> > > Scientology Tech' to his own benefit is a 'Scientologist', and,
> > > since I not only own at least a half-dozen dictionaries and
> > > *use* them, and using a dictionary is part of the Scientology
> > > Tech, I am a Scientologist.
>
> > Sweet, let me know when you have your LifeTime Membership to the IAS.
>
> > >> That's assuming
> > >> that the core activity of scientology is auditing, and not systematically
> > >> defrauding people, which is the argument of many critics. There is that
> > >> "business interest" which is pursued by some, if not many
> > >> "scientologists",
> > >> but that is not the core activity of the subject, at least not as
> > >> understood
> > >> by most people calling themselves scientologists.
>
> > > If I were to specify the 'core activity' of the 'Scientology
> > > Movement' it wouldn't be auditing *or* the 'business interests',
> > > which are both subservient to the *political* activity; i.e.
> > > 'Clearing the Planet'.
>
> > > Zinj
> > > --
> > > You Can Lead a Clam to Reason; but You Can't Make Him Think
>
> > Really? And clearing the planet means what to you?- Hide quoted text -
>
> Actually, what I said was that it's Hubbard's definition.
>
> I only wrote that ten bazillion times. Zinj needs to get his head out
> of his ass.
It doesn't matter how many times you write it, Fluff. You can write it
for the rest of eternity. You can wear you fingers out on multiple
keyboard and empty pens for the next decade.
You can continue writing utter bullshit, indoctrinated by LRH or not
See what I mean?
Unlikely, due to your severe state of hypnosis. Perhaps a
professional therapist could help you with that. But you probably
wouldn't want to find out, would you? OK. Just keep typing. It's
redundant, but if it works for you, fine.
>
> C
>
> www.claireswazey.com
|