On Feb 16, 11:24 am, "Kevin Brady" wrote:
> "Ball of Fluff" wrote in messagenews:1171652302.008723.258190@t69g2000cwt.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 16, 3:25 am, "Kevin Brady" wrote:
> >> "Zinj" wrote in message
>
> >>news:MPG.203ea7c99270f561989869@news2.lightlink.com...
>
> >> > In article <45d4d...@news2.lightlink.com>, gomorr...@hotmail.com
> >> > says...
>
> >> >
>
> >> >> People can argue
> >> >> endlessly over the definition of what a scientologist is, but to me,
> >> >> it's
> >> >> a
> >> >> person who practices scientology to the extent they have been trained
> >> >> in
> >> >> it,
> >> >> and I find people who haven't been trained (or trained themselves,
> >> >> using
> >> >> internet resources) to at least Class V, and preferably Class VI to be
> >> >> essentially blow-hards who don't understand the subject.
>
> >> > Strange. By your definition, since I've never been 'trained' in
> >> > Scientology, and I practice it to the level of my 'training'
> >> > (not at all), I'm a Scientologist :)
>
> >> If that's what you took from it, good! Adroit sidestepping of the point,
> >> as
> >> usual.
>
> >> > Sounds like the Fluffy definition, where anyone who 'uses
> >> > Scientology Tech' to his own benefit is a 'Scientologist', and,
> >> > since I not only own at least a half-dozen dictionaries and
> >> > *use* them, and using a dictionary is part of the Scientology
> >> > Tech, I am a Scientologist.
>
> >> Sweet, let me know when you have your LifeTime Membership to the IAS.
>
> >> >> That's assuming
> >> >> that the core activity of scientology is auditing, and not
> >> >> systematically
> >> >> defrauding people, which is the argument of many critics. There is
> >> >> that
> >> >> "business interest" which is pursued by some, if not many
> >> >> "scientologists",
> >> >> but that is not the core activity of the subject, at least not as
> >> >> understood
> >> >> by most people calling themselves scientologists.
>
> >> > If I were to specify the 'core activity' of the 'Scientology
> >> > Movement' it wouldn't be auditing *or* the 'business interests',
> >> > which are both subservient to the *political* activity; i.e.
> >> > 'Clearing the Planet'.
>
> >> > Zinj
> >> > --
> >> > You Can Lead a Clam to Reason; but You Can't Make Him Think
>
> >> Really? And clearing the planet means what to you?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > Actually, what I said was that it's Hubbard's definition.
>
> > I only wrote that ten bazillion times. Zinj needs to get his head out
> > of his ass.
>
> > C
>
> >www.claireswazey.com
>
> Don't hold your breath.
>
>
Fer sure. But I will keep setting the record straight.
Either I invented the definition or I didn't.
And I didn't.
C
www.claireswazey.com
|